OPINION: Good
Dads Make Good Bosses
The integration of work and family in the
lives of executive men may be one of the most substantial transitions affecting businesses
today.
BY ARTHUR COLEMAN, MBA '85
WE ARE WITNESSING a widespread phenomenon among American men--one that is as likely to
affect a fast-track senior executive as it is a middle manager who has decided to
sacrifice career advancement in favor of more family time, and one that may affect women
managers as much as it does men. This phenomenon--the integration of work and family in
the lives of key executive men--will radically change how companies relate to their
employees' families, their male executives, and, just as important, their female
executives.
In fact, this change in social attitudes may be the
quiet pin drop that finally shatters the glass ceiling and fills a large percentage of
executive positions with highly qualified women. As executive men assume stereotypically
female roles in the home, the values and managerial styles expected in senior executives
will shift to styles that make it easier to promote women into the executive suite.
The situation seems to be the result of interlocking
social trends. As married women move into the workforce, they are spending substantially
less time on household maintenance and child care. Statistics show that married men in the
workforce have effectively increased their time on household maintenance and child care by
almost the exact amount their spouses have decreased it, to the point where married men
spend just slightly less time than their spouses on household duties. In other words,
gender roles are equalizing.
Whether as a result of such role equalization or
because of other social factors, this generation of fathers has very different attitudes
toward fathering than the previous generation. Today's fathers increasingly want both high
achievement and the ability to spend time with their families. This is a fundamental
change from the older model (termed the "mañana model" by Fernando Bartolome of
Harvard Business School), where male managers willingly pushed family concerns off into
the future.
The change has profound implications for today's
families, but it has been largely ignored by the press and by the fathers themselves. The
press generally covers only the extremes of behavior, focusing either on the full-time
stay-at-home father (Mr. Mom) or on the father who has run away from his responsibilities
to his family. The more important silence comes from working fathers. Like mothers before
them, these men have created an unintentional conspiracy of silence for fear of being
pigeonholed into a second-tier career, or "daddy track." How many men (and
women) reading this article have ever quietly left a meeting early, claiming another
meeting when in fact they needed to pick up their children--out of fear that leaving work
early for family reasons would be perceived as a lack of commitment to the company?
Managers would be well advised to pay attention to
this trend and work to help their employees--especially men--create an integrated
work/family environment. There are five solid business reasons for doing this:
1. EMPLOYEE RETENTION. Many high achievers in
today's corporations, whether male or female, have coparenting responsibilities. Helping
to reduce their stress in balancing work and family will be considered a key employee
benefit and will enhance retention of these critical people.
2. INCREASED EMPLOYEE COMMITMENT. A 1992 study
at St. Paul Companies found that "staff who believed work was causing problems in
their personal lives were much more likely to make mistakes than those who had few
job-related personal problems." Another study, released by DuPont in October 1995,
found that employees who use work/life programs are 45 percent more likely to "go the
extra mile" to assure that DuPont succeeds. Study after study shows that there is a
direct correlation between a supportive work environment and increased employee
commitment.
3. IMPROVED PROFITABILITY. These same studies
show that companies can actually measure a positive return from such programs. First
Tennessee National Corp. started treating family issues as part of business strategy and
found that "supervisors rated by their subordinates as supportive of work-family
balance retained employees twice as long as the bank average and kept 7 percent more
retail customers," contributing to a 55 percent profit gain over two years.
4. HEALTHIER, WELL-ADJUSTED CHILDREN. The
involvement of fathers in their children's lives has important, positive impacts at every
stage of development, studies show. This includes higher reading levels, better math
competence, and greater willingness of children to take initiative and direct
themselves--as well as reduced drug use, juvenile delinquency, and teen pregnancy.
Considering the costs to companies of dealing with these issues (such as remedial training
programs to bring employees' math or reading skills to needed levels), it is clear that
helping employees develop well-adjusted children is in companies' best short- and
long-term interest.
But there is an even subtler point to be made here.
Senior executives at corporations are the company's best and brightest leaders, with the
best people skills and organizational abilities. We might hope that at least some of these
skills would transfer by example from the active parents among them to the next
generation. Such a transfer would ensure that a fundamentally higher level of leadership
skill and managerial competence is brought to bear as the next generation enters the
workforce. Instead of having children who resent "the company" because it took
daddy or mommy away from them too often and who avoid business careers because of this
resentment, companies would have an enhanced foundation on which to build their future.
5. ENHANCED MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP SKILLS.
It has been my experience, and that of other active fathers I work with, that many of the
skills we develop by handling family situations are ones we need for managing teams in the
corporation.
A personal anecdote: I used to say "no" a
lot to people making requests of me, and I was perceived as being difficult to deal with.
In dealing with my young son, however, I learned quickly that "no" worked badly
as a management tool. Instead, I learned to give my child two choices. This empowered him,
made him feel in control, and got me a lot more cooperation in the long term. Today, I use
that same technique extensively at work. As a result, I get much more cooperation from
coworkers and an improved perception of my style.
Attitudes toward work/family integration for men as
well as for women are changing. The senior-executive mothers and fathers of the future
will be active parents. Executives building the corporation of today will have to respect
the needs of these young leaders if they hope to retain them. By helping them attain a
satisfying balance of their business and parenting roles, corporations will achieve
long-term success while achieving their short-term goals.
Excerpted from Sun Journal, a publication of Sun
Microsystems.

|