NewsApplyContactSearchHome
Stanford Graduate School of Business
Stanford Business

Research Reports: Analysis or Publicity?

ILLUSTRATION BY A.J. GARCES
ILLUSTRATION BY A.J. GARCES

February, 2003

SELLING IS A “NOBLE function in the United States,” finance professor George Parker told alumni/ae last fall, but “no one should ever expect salespeople to give an independent evaluation of their products.” That, in a sense, is what many investors did when they ignored the wording on the bottom of analysts’ research reports that says the report was prepared by an employee of a company doing business with the firm whose stock was being analyzed. In an Alumni Weekend talk on accounting issues in the wake of business scandals, Parker said he had come to wonder if investors needed the word “advertisement” printed at the top of these reports in the same way that newspapers label ads that look too much like stories. “Selling is meant to be advocacy, and advocacy has a place in markets,” he said, “although it has to be labeled as advocacy.” Parker gave similar talks to two groups of alumni/ae in Mexico.


Previous Spreadsheet Previous Spreadsheet || Next Spreadsheet Next Spreadsheet

Stanford Business Home

Spreadsheet

Students Thrown into Leadership Roles
Fond and Not-So-Fond Memories
Shoppers Browse Mail, Mall, Web
Alumna Puts Old Bones to New Use
Poet Dana Gioia Goes to Washington
Rankings Report Card
Outsider Turns Around Nissan
Rescuing an Elephant
Research Reports: Analysis or Publicity
Solomon at Forefront of Finance Evolution
The Waiting Game
CEO Sees Inequities in Patent Rights
Battle of the Bands
Entrepreneurship at the Dining Table
For the Record: Placement Report: Class of 2002