Skip to main content
Menu
Stanford Graduate School of Business
Faculty & Research Excessive Leverage and Risk in Banking “Loss Absorbing” Alternatives to Equity

“Loss Absorbing” Alternatives to Equity

“Too Much Equity? If Anything, Brown-Vitter Asks Too Little,”  Anat Admati, American Banker, June 24, 2013

“More bank equity serves us all better,” Anat Admati and Neil Barofsky, published in Financial Times, March 6, 2012

‘Comments on Proposal to Ensure the Loss Absorbency of Regulatory Capital at the Point of Non-viability’,  Anat Admati, submitted to the Basel Committee on Bank Supervision, October, 2010.

Additional Commentary

Why More Equity in Banking is Desirable
An Easy Path towards Safer and Healthier Banking
The "Too Big to Fail" Problem
Corporate Governance: Decision-makers vs. Stakeholders
The 2007-2009 crisis
Capital Regulation
Why "Level Playing Field" Arguments are invalid
"Loss Absorbing" Alternatives to Equity
Fallacies and Academic Myths
Return to Main Writings
Home
655 Knight Way
Stanford, CA 94305
USA

Footer contact links

  • Contact Us
  • Visit Us
  • Stay In Touch

Follow Us

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn

Footer 1

  • Companies, Organizations & Recruiters
  • Stanford Community
  • Newsroom

Footer 2

  • Library
  • Jobs
  • MyGSB
© Stanford Graduate School of Business

Footer legal links

  • Accessibility
  • Non-Discrimination Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Stanford University