Research by the Corporate Governance Research Initiative

CGRI research spans these topics: general principles, board of directors, leadership and succession planning, compensation, audit and risk, shareholders, and proxy advisory.

Publication Search
Publication Type
Research Focus Area
Results for
Working Paper

CEO Personality and Firm Policies

Ian D. Gow, Steven N. Kaplan, David F. Larcker, Anastasia A. Zakolyukina
July2016

Based on two samples of high quality personality data for chief executive officers (CEOs), we use linguistic features extracted from conferences calls and statistical learning techniques to develop a measure of CEO personality in terms of the Big…

Stanford Closer Look

Chairman and CEO: The Controversy Over Board Leadership Structure

David F. Larcker, Brian Tayan
Stanford Closer Look Series Corporate Governance Research Initiative June2016

One of the most controversial issues in corporate governance is whether the CEO of a corporation should also serve as chairman of the board. In theory, an independent board chair improves the ability of the board to oversee management. However,…

Stanford Closer Look

Scoundrels in the C-Suite: How Should the Board Respond When a CEO’s Bad Behavior Makes the News?

David F. Larcker, Brian Tayan
Stanford Closer Look Series Corporate Governance Research Initiative May2016

The board of directors has a responsibility to investigate credible allegations that management has engaged in activity that is not in the interest of the company or its shareholders. In the case of illegal activity, the appropriate response is…

Journal Article

Causal Inference in Accounting Research

Ian D. Gow, David F. Larcker, Peter C. Reiss
Journal of Accounting Reseach April2016 Vol. 54 Issue 2

This paper examines the approaches accounting researchers adopt to draw causal inferences using observational (or nonexperimental) data. The vast majority of accounting research papers draw causal inferences notwithstanding the well-known…

Stanford Closer Look

Governance Aches and Pains: Is Bad Governance Chronic?

David F. Larcker, Brian Tayan
Stanford Closer Look Series Corporate Governance Research Initiative (CGRI) April2016

Institutional investors pay considerable attention to the quality of a company’s governance. Unfortunately, it is difficult for outside observers to reliably gauge governance quality. Oftentimes, poor governance manifests itself only after…

Stanford Closer Look

CEO Pay at Valeant: Does Extreme Compensation Create Extreme Risk?

David F. Larcker, Brian Tayan
Stanford Closer Look Series Corporate Governance Research Initiative (CGRI) April2016

The litmus test for an effective compensation program is whether it provides “pay for performance.” While the concept of pay for performance is simple, its implementation is not. In particular, boards must consider not only whether a compensation…

Research Spotlight

Diverse Boards

David F. Larcker, Brian Tayan
CGRI Research Spotlight Series Corporate Governance Research Initiative April2016

This Research Spotlight provides a summary of the research literature on whether companies with diverse boards (in terms of background, gender, or ethnicity) exhibit better performance and governance quality than companies without diverse boards…

Stanford Closer Look

How Important Is Culture? A Second Look at Keller Williams Realty

David F. Larcker, Brian Tayan
Stanford Closer Look Series Corporate Governance Research Initiative (CGRI) April2016

Keller Williams is one of the most successful real estate franchises in the world. The leaders of the company attribute its growth in large part to a cultural model that emphasizes profit sharing, interdependence, and success through the efforts…

Stanford Closer Look

CEO Pay, Performance, and Value Sharing

Nicholas E. Donatiello, David F. Larcker, Brian Tayan
Stanford Closer Look Series Corporate Governance Research Initiative, Rock Center for Corporate Governance March2016

CEO compensation is a highly controversial subject. While most company directors believe that CEO pay is not a problem, the majority of the American public believes that it is. The difficulties that boards face in justifying CEO pay levels in…

Survey

Americans and CEO Pay: 2016 Public Perception Survey on CEO Compensation

David F. Larcker, Nicholas E. Donatiello, Brian Tayan
CGRI Survey Series Corporate Governance Research Initiative, Stanford Rock Center for Corporate Governance February2016

Recently, the Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University conducted a nationwide survey of 1,202 individuals — representative by gender, race, age, political affiliation, household income, and state residence — to understand…

Survey

CEOs and Directors on Pay: 2016 Survey on CEO Compensation

David F. Larcker, John T. Thompson, Nicholas E. Donatiello, Brian Tayan
CGRI Survey Series Corporate Governance Research Initiative, Stanford Rock Center for Corporate Governance, Heidrick & Struggles February2016
Research Spotlight

Say on Pay

David F. Larcker, Brian Tayan
CGRI Research Spotlight Series Corporate Governance Research Initiative 2016

This Research Spotlight provides a summary of the academic literature on how shareholder voting on executive compensation plans influences executive pay. It reviews the evidence of:

  • The impact of “vote no” campaigns
  • The…
Stanford Closer Look

Seven Myths of Boards of Directors

David F. Larcker, Brian Tayan
Stanford Closer Look Series Corporate Governance Research Initiative (CGRI) October2015

Corporate governance experts pay considerable attention to issues involving the board of directors. Because of the scope of the board’s role and the vast responsibilities that come with directorship, companies are expected to adhere to common…

Stanford Closer Look

Trust and Consequences: A Survey of Berkshire Hathaway Operating Managers

David F. Larcker, Brian Tayan
Stanford Closer Look Series Corporate Governance Research Initiative (CGRI) October2015

For much of its history, Berkshire Hathaway has been regarded primarily as the investment vehicle of Warren Buffett rather than a bona fide corporation. However, as Berkshire Hathaway has expanded beyond its core insurance operations, more…

Research Spotlight

Staggered Boards

David F. Larcker, Brian Tayan
CGRI Research Spotlight Series Corporate Governance Research Initiative September2015

This Research Spotlight provides a summary of the academic literature on how staggered boards impact shareholder value by insulating management from the pressures of capital markets. It reviews the evidence of:

  • Staggered board…
Journal Article

Corporate Governance, Incentives, and Tax Avoidance

Christopher S. Armstrong, Jennifer L. Blouin, Alan D. Jagolinzer, David F. Larcker
Journal of Accounting and Economics August2015 Vol. 60 Issue 1

We examine the link between corporate governance, managerial incentives, and corporate tax avoidance. Similar to other investment opportunities that involve risky expected cash flows, unresolved agency problems may lead managers to engage in more…

Book

Corporate Governance Matters: A Closer Look at Organizational Choices and Their Consequences (2nd Edition)

David F. Larcker, Brian Tayan
Pearson FT Press July2015

This is the most comprehensive and up-to-date reference for implementing and sustaining superior corporate governance. Stanford corporate governance experts David Larcker and Bryan Tayan carefully synthesize current academic and professional…

Stanford Closer Look

Pro Forma Compensation: Useful Insight or Window Dressing?

David F. Larcker, Brian Tayan, Youfei Xiao
Stanford Closer Look Series July2015

In recent years, companies have begun to voluntarily disclose alternative measures of CEO compensation. These figures differ — sometimes significantly — from those reported in the summary compensation tables of the annual proxy. The motivation to…

Survey

2015 Survey on Board of Directors of Nonprofit Organizations

David F. Larcker, William Meehan III, Nicholas E. Donatiello, Brian Tayan
Stanford GSB, Rock Center for Corporate Governance, BoardSource, and GuideStar April2015

In fall 2014, the Stanford Graduate School of Business, in collaboration with BoardSource and GuideStar, surveyed 924 directors of nonprofit organizations about the composition, structure, and practices of their boards.

The skills,…

Stanford Closer Look

How Important Is Culture?: An Inside Look at Keller Williams Realty

David F. Larcker, Brian Tayan
Stanford Closer Look Series April2015

Corporate leaders pay considerable attention to the strategy and finances of their organizations but often less attention to organizational features that impact whether their strategy is successful, including the decision-making structure and the…

Stanford Closer Look

What Can For-Profit and Nonprofit Boards Learn from Each Other About Improving Governance?

Nicholas E. Donatiello, David F. Larcker, Brian Tayan
Stanford Closer Look Series April2015

For-profit and nonprofit organizations exist for different reasons: for-profits to generate a return on investment for shareholders, and nonprofits to pursue charitable and social activities unrelated to commerce. The obligations of the boards of…

Survey

2015 Investor Survey: Deconstructing Proxy Statements — What Matters to Investors

David F. Larcker, Ronald Schneider, Brian Tayan, Aaron Boyd
Stanford University, RR Donnelley, and Equilar February2015

In the fall of 2014, RR Donnelley, Equilar, and the Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University surveyed 64 asset managers and owners with a combined $17 trillion in assets to understand how institutional investors use the…

Journal Article

Outsourcing Shareholder Voting to Proxy Advisory Firms

David F. Larcker, Allan L. McCall, Gaizka Ormazabal
Journal of Law and Economics February2015 Vol. 58 Issue 1

This paper examines the economic consequences of institutional investors outsourcing research and voting decisions in public company elections to proxy advisory firms. We investigate the implications of these decisions in the context of…

Stanford Closer Look

The Ideal Proxy Statement

David F. Larcker, Brian Tayan
Stanford Closer Look Series February2015

Institutional investors are highly dissatisfied with the quality of information that they receive about corporate governance policies and practices in the annual proxy. Across the board, they want proxies to be shorter, more concise, more candid…