Are campaign donors simply affluent people who happen to give to campaigns, or do donors and the affluent differ in their policy views? To investigate this, we surveyed verified 2017–2018 donors, affluent individuals, and the general public. Comparing copartisans shows that donors in both parties hold more ideologically extreme positions on domestic policy than either the affluent or the general public. On international issues, Democratic donors are more pro-internationalist than their affluent and general-public counterparts, while Republican donors resemble affluent copartisans. These patterns cannot be explained by demographic differences or levels of political interest. Examining variation across donor types, we find that some donors are more prone to extreme positions than others, yet donors remain distinct from the affluent whether they contributed out of state, donated small amounts, or recently supported a presidential candidate.
- Faculty
- Publications
- Postdoctoral Scholars
-
Research Labs & Initiatives
- Cities, Housing & Society Lab
- Corporate Governance Research Initiative
- Corporations and Society Initiative
- Golub Capital Social Impact Lab
- Initiative for Financial Decision-Making
- Policy and Innovation Initiative
- Rapid Decarbonization Initiative
- Value Chain Innovation Initiative
- Venture Capital Initiative
- Behavioral Lab
- Data, Analytics & Research Computing