- The Experience
- The Programs
- Faculty & Research
- Insights
- Accounting
- Big Data
- Career & Success
- Corporate Governance
- Economics
- Education
- Energy & Environment
- Entrepreneurship
- Finance
- Government
- Health Care
- Innovation
- Leadership
- Management
- Marketing
- Nonprofit
- Operations, Information & Technology
- Organizational Behavior
- Political Economy
- Social Impact
- Supply Chain
- Alumni
- Events
Chameleons: The Misuse of Theoretical Models in Finance and Economics
Chameleons: The Misuse of Theoretical Models in Finance and Economics
March 2014Working Paper No. 3020
In this essay I discuss how theoretical models in finance and economics are used in ways that make them “chameleons” and how chameleons devalue the intellectual currency and muddy policy debates. A model becomes a chameleon when it is built on assumptions with dubious connections to the real world but nevertheless has conclusions that are uncritically (or not critically enough) applied to understanding our economy. I discuss how chameleons are created and nurtured by the mistaken notion that one should not judge a model by its assumptions, by the unfounded argument that models should have equal standing until definitive empirical tests are conducted, and by misplaced appeals to “as-if” arguments, mathematical elegance, subtlety, references to assumptions that are “standard in the literature,” and the need for tractability.