-
The Experience
-
About Stanford GSB
About Our Degree Programs
-
-
The Programs
-
Full-Time Degree Programs
Non-Degree & Certificate Programs
-
-
Faculty & Research
-
Faculty
Faculty Research
Research Hub
Centers & Initiatives
-
-
Insights
-
Topics
-
-
Alumni
-
Welcome, Alumni
-
-
Events
-
Admission Events & Information Sessions
-
Economic Reasoning with a Racial Hue: Is the Immigration Consensus Purely Race Neutral?
Economic Reasoning with a Racial Hue: Is the Immigration Consensus Purely Race Neutral?
August 28,2017Working Paper No. 3590
Leading research is converging upon the finding that citizens from immigrant-receiving nations strongly prefer the entry of high-skilled to low-skilled immigrants. Prior studies have largely interpreted this “skill premium” as deriving from sociotropic economic considerations. We argue that a purely economic conceptualization offers an incomplete understanding of the processes generating the skill premium, as it overlooks the role of prejudice as a factor undergirding citizens’ preferences. We contend that the skill premium is a manifestation of prejudice insomuch as it constitutes a preference for those atypical of the existing immigrant population. Through re-analysis of data from published work, as well as via original survey experiments, we demonstrate that a purely economic interpretation of the skill premium fails a range of critical tests. Our findings suggest that rather than solely representing a race-neutral preference for skilled immigrants, the skill premium partly represents a preference against disliked prevalent immigrants.
Keywords
immigration, public opinion, sociotropic politics, prejudice