Publications

We empower faculty to design and discover original research that challenges conventions and creates breakthroughs that push boundaries of knowledge.

Publication Types

Journal Articles

View peer-reviewed research by Stanford GSB faculty, published in leading journals across the business disciplines.

Books

View books written or edited by Stanford GSB faculty, from textbooks to books for a wider audience.

Working Papers

View scholarly works-in-progress by Stanford GSB faculty, which often appear in final form in academic journals.

Case Studies

View abstract and ordering information for case studies written and published by faculty at Stanford GSB.

Browse Publications

Publication Search
Publication Type
Academic Area
Results for
Stanford Closer Look

Risk Management Breakdown at AXA Rosenberg: The Curious Case of a Quant Manager Trusted Too Much

David F. Larcker, Brian Tayan
Stanford Closer Look Series May2013

All companies face challenges designing a governance system that works best for their particular situation and structure. Even the owners of privately held companies sometimes struggle with issues of separation and control. The challenges can be…

Stanford Closer Look

Where Experts Get It Wrong: Independence vs. Leadership in Corporate Governance

David F. Larcker, Brian Tayan
Stanford Closer Look Series March2013

Over the last few decades, researchers have taken a thorough and critical look at corporate governance from various perspectives. For the most part, they have found that structural features of corporate governance have little or no relation to…

Stanford Closer Look

And Then a Miracle Happens!: How Do Proxy Advisory Firms Develop Their Voting Recommendations?

David F. Larcker, Allan McCall, Brian Tayan
Stanford Closer Look Series February2013

Proxy advisory firms are independent, for-profit consulting companies that provide voting recommendations to individual and institutional investors. Research shows that these firms have significant influence on voting outcomes. Given this…

Stanford Closer Look

Union Activism: Do Union Pension Funds Act Solely in the Interest of Beneficiaries?

David F. Larcker, Brian Tayan
Stanford Closer Look Series December2012

Union pension funds are active in the proxy process, sponsoring approximately one-third of shareholder proposals each year. How do union pension funds determine which positions to advocate and which companies to target? Are their proposals made…

Stanford Closer Look

Is a Powerful CEO Good or Bad for Shareholders?

David F. Larcker, Brian Tayan
Stanford Closer Look Series November2012

Americans tend to admire powerful leaders. However, it is not clear the extent to which having a powerful CEO is beneficial to an organization. How much power is too much power?

Stanford Closer Look

Shareholder Lawsuits: Where Is the Line Between Legitimate and Frivolous?

David F. Larcker, Brian Tayan
Stanford Closer Look Series November2012

Recently, shareholder groups have sued companies for inadequate disclosure in the annual proxy. They allege that companies provide insufficient disclosure to determine how to vote on “say on pay.” If a company follows SEC guidelines, why is this…

Stanford Closer Look

Fixed or Contingent: How Should “Governance Monitors” Be Paid?

David F. Larcker, Brian Tayan
Stanford Closer Look Series October2012

The responsibility of corporate monitors is to safeguard assets and reduce agency costs. Should monitors be paid bonuses? If so, what form should they take and what performance targets should be used?

Stanford Closer Look

Ten Myths of “Say on Pay”

David F. Larcker, Allan McCall, Gaizka Ormazabal, Brian Tayan
Stanford Closer Look Series June2012

The public believes that “say on pay” reduces executive compensation and leads to improved compensation practices. The research evidence, however, shows this is not the case. Is it time to rethink say on pay? The Closer Look series is a…

Stanford Closer Look

Monitoring Risks Before They Go Viral: Is it Time for the Board to Embrace Social Media?

David F. Larcker, Sarah M Larcker, Brian Tayan
Stanford Closer Look Series April2012

Given the pervasiveness of social media, should the board of directors pay closer attention to the information exchanged on these sites? Can this information be used to improve oversight and risk management?

Stanford Closer Look

Sudden Death of a CEO: Are Companies Prepared When Lightning Strikes?

David F. Larcker, Brian Tayan
Stanford Closer Look Series March2012

The sudden death of a CEO can provide insight into the quality of succession planning at a company. Why don’t more companies have a truly operational plan in place?

Stanford Closer Look

What Is CEO Talent Worth?

David F. Larcker, Brian Tayan
Stanford Closer Look Series January2012

The topic of executive compensation elicits strong emotions but somewhat less critical analysis. How much value creation should be attributable to the efforts of the CEO? What percent of this value should be fairly offered as compensation?

Stanford Closer Look

What Does It Mean for an Executive to Make A Million?

David F. Larcker, Allan McCall, Brian Tayan
Stanford Closer Look Series December2011

Executive compensation figures are not what they seem. Executive pay packages contain a diverse mix of incentives whose ultimate value is often quite different from their expected value. Why don’t companies clearly differentiate between expected…

Stanford Closer Look

Leadership Challenges at Hewlett-Packard: Through the Looking Glass

David F. Larcker, Brian Tayan
Stanford Closer Look Series October2011

Hewlett-Packard has faced numerous leadership and strategic changes over the last twelve years. It has also been involved in more than its fair share of controversies. Are these signs of governance failure at the board level?

Stanford Closer Look

Scarlet Letter: Are the CEOs and Directors of Failed Companies "Tainted"?

David F. Larcker, Brian Tayan
Stanford Closer Look Series September2011

Recent experience suggests that many CEOs and directors of failed companies are able to obtain or retain directorships at other companies after their departure. Should this be a concern for shareholders?

Stanford Closer Look

The NCAA Adopts "Dodd-Frank": A Fable

David F. Larcker, Brian Tayan
Stanford Closer Look Series September2011

In this fictitious tale, we apply the governance provisions of Dodd-Frank to the world of college football. If they would not work in that setting, should we expect them to work in business?

Stanford Closer Look

Are Current CEOs The Best Board Members?

David F. Larcker, Brian Tayan
Stanford Closer Look Series August2011

By many measures, current CEOs should be the best candidates to serve on the board of directors. However, recent survey evidence suggests this may not be the case. Should companies reassess the importance of this criteria when looking for new…

Stanford Closer Look

Seven Myths of Corporate Governance

David F. Larcker, Brian Tayan
Stanford Closer Look Series June2011

This case examines seven commonly accepted myths about corporate governance. How can we expect managerial behavior and firm performance to improve, if practitioners continue to rely on myths rather than facts to guide their decisions?

Stanford Closer Look

Seven Myths of Executive Compensation

David F. Larcker, Brian Tayan
Stanford Closer Look Series June2011

This case examines seven commonly accepted myths about executive compensation. Public perception is that executives are overpaid and that compensation contracts are not structured in the best interest of shareholders. Why don’t experts rely on…

Stanford Closer Look

Tesla Motors: The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO

David F. Larcker, Brian Tayan
Stanford Closer Look Series May2011

This case study examines prominent features of the governance system of Tesla Motors, as it has evolved from inception to IPO. Now that Tesla is public, how is its governance likely to change in the future?

Stanford Closer Look

Do ISS Voting Recommendations Create Shareholder Value?

David F. Larcker, Brian Tayan
Stanford Closer Look Series April2011

The recommendations of Institutional Shareholder Services are influential in the proxy voting process, particularly in matters relating to equity compensation and exchange offers. What evidence is there that these recommendations increase…